Skip to main content

About your Search

20121007
20121015
Search Results 0 to 6 of about 7 (some duplicates have been removed)
fenty. >> i think in terms of education vouchers should be considered 100% by both parties. >> that's not a medicare voucher. >> but to be clear, cornell, the actually romney plan and, again thrks is the distinction between the ryan plan and romney plan is crucial, the romney plan is the biden plan which moves away from a straightforward voucher and keeps some form of traditional medicare. i think your attack is an example of what ryan has to do. >> clarify for me now, republicans aren't for medicare vouchers? they're not for that? we're making news now. is that true now? >> the romney plan is not accurately described i think as a voucher plan whereas the original ryan plan was. >> so we're completely disavowing -- >> i'm not doing anything. i'm not here speaking for the republican party. i'm describing the difference between vouchers. >> which is exactly what they did the last debate. >> i think we all know that nobody's -- look. paul ryan says he never uses the word voucher, but he says you're going to get a reimbursement, something to the government you can take to the marketplac
needs government. it needs government for a decent education, for job skills, for infrastructure, for environment, for climate. a lot of other americans do also. they don't really see what's coming necessarily because now it's being aggressively disgu e disguised, but i think it's very dangerous. >> in your book "civilization" you talk about the fact that cultures and civil gations are not simply about figures, about math. they're about things like compassion and human respect for other humans who may be in need. these two don't regard that, they don't even mention those kind of issues. >> if you look at what ryan over the years has proposed, he said let's balance the budget by cutting right at the knees the poorest people in our country, going after medicaid, going after the income support for the most vulnerable people in our country. now, those people don't necessarily vote. they have no voice in the political campaigns, they're not heard, but the callousness of this is really disgusting actually, and this is at the core of it. of course, that's the whole ayn rand philosophy
to educate tir rkuthemcaon rensigaxes. alot ohis show about when you talk about taxing the top 1, or 2 or 3% that those tend to be the employers in the country. i'll tell you thi also, martha aroulk to a lot of employers hi n isolated. i talked to guy who owns 50 fast-food restaurants. he says the obama healthcare is going to cost him $11,000 more a itngtilr eloe. aroutfs. relaondaxes have and i do think they reduce employment. >> matt, david siegel says this. he says we pay state taxes, federal sacksess, property taxes, sale and use taxes. workers compensation taxes and emoynt tese t anirdtmo ge a tes. i guess even the people who help manage the taxes will probably still have their jobs either way. what do you think about that matt? >> if you take care of taxes and regulations your jobs will probly be booming in the next egak gd years in oma hes o is at are are paying so much in taxes there is a lot of uncertainty going forward that we may be paying more. th united states has the highest corporate rate in the world. if wre going to be taxes the through obamaare,no uterigns wtp tto d hatre
was happening here. i think it's quite appropriate for employers to educate their workers about the implication of more regulations, higher taxes. we talked a lot on this show about when you talk about taxing the top 1, or 2 3% that those tend to be the employers in the country. i'll tell you this also, martha i talk to a lot of employers around the country. this is not isolated. i talked to a guy who owns 50 fast-food restaurants. he says the obama healthcare is going to cost him $11,000 more a year per employee. it's going to take a million dollars out of the business. that's the type of impact the regulations and taxes have and i do think they reduce employment. >> matt, david siegel says this. he says we pay state taxes, federal sacksess, property taxes, sale and use taxes. workers compensation taxes and unemployment taxes i have to hire an entire department to manage all the taxes. i guess even the people who help manage the taxes will probably still have their jobs either way. what do you think about that matt? >> if you take care of taxes and regulations your jobs will probably be boomin
. but if take you away early childhood education... slash k-12 funding... and cut college aid for middle class families ... they won't go far. yet that's exactly what mitt romney wants to do... ...to pay for a $250,000 tax break for multi-llionaires. if mitt romney wins, the middle class loses. priorities usa action is responsible for the content of this advertising. anand great benefits, vote forf wplplacequestion seven.ood pay.. i"i'm not in favor of a a$5 trillion tax cut. that's not my plan." mitchell: "the nonpartisan tax policy center concluded that mitt romney's tax plan would cost $4.8 trillion over 10 years." vo: why won't romney level with us about his tax plan, which gives the wealthy huge new tax breaks? because according to experts, he'd have to raise taxes on the middle class - or increase the deficit to pay for it. if we can't trust him here... how could we ever trust him here? >>> a lot more reunions coming up. we have a big week here on "gma." rob lowe is co-hosting tomorrow. ann romney coming in to co-host wednesday. sam, thank you for starting us off in a great fashion. >> c
Search Results 0 to 6 of about 7 (some duplicates have been removed)